education & tech

mLearning, teacher, scholar, social media

Education + Tech

Education & Tech, was created to build hope that education based on social technologies, can transform the new century, and enable abundance not only spiritually but economically. Milton Ramirez, Ed.D. - @tonnet is the founder & editor. He is a teacher, tech blogger, writes on education, and hails this blog from Union, NJ. For further questions, tips or concerns please e-mail him to:miltonramirez [at] educationandtech [dot] com

Teacher + Scholar

If you are a regular to Blog Education & Tech, you shall remember that I am a blogger and I'd written a post about education almost everyday since 2003. Education & Tech provides you with education news, expert tech advice, classroom management ideas, and social media tools for educators, administrators, parents and k-12 students.

Welcome Twitterer! Why not like our site for more updates?

Moving from Security Networks to Evolution of Testing at Schools

Early tonight, there was an interesting edchat on Twitter. How to work with everyone on striking a balance between learning and network safety and security was the topic. After a very crowded meet up, most participants seem to concur to the next recommendations: Quality tasks, relationships, monitoring, follow through, modeling, set the stage for positive behavior, as Becky Fisher wrap it up.

There were innumerable analogies. But there was one that caught our attention, and it was referred to banning not internet use, but thinking. Amy Brown tweeted: "Ban thinking! Isn't that why we created students tests? Oops! Wrong discussion!" This tweet made me remember all discussions Matt Townsley has had about assessments over at his blog. A landing page for any teacher interested on grading and evaluations.

Moving from networks security to assessments is not easy. However, I don't mean to force you to keep reading, but knowing that 90% of our readers are educators, I am committed to take you over The Big Tests: What Ends Do They Serve?

This is an interesting analysis conducted by Gerald Bracey of ASCD. The article spins around how much information a test reveals on a student and how three testing programs may take a teacher to confirm Bracey's investigation. ASCD's writer mentions one domestic and two international testing programs: The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP, Program for International Student Assessment (PISA, and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS.

The author accurately asserts that "to measure the quality of our schools, we need more instruction-sensitive measures than NAEP, PISA, or TIMSS" and continues to dig in our education history:

    In the last 50 years, the United States has descended from viewing tests first as a useful tool, then as a necessity, and finally as the sole instrument needed to evaluate teachers, schools, districts, states, and nations (Bracey, 2009). In a nation where test mania prevails, tests will occupy part of the education landscape until we can dig ourselves out of that 50-year hole.

If you want to receive my future posts regularly for FREE, please subscribe in a reader or by e-mail. Follow me on Twitter. For other concerns, Contact Me at anytime.


Blogger User's Comments

HTML: < b >, < i >, < a > accepted. Try the scaped code here.

Still didn't find what you were looking for? Please, try again